She was born in Aydın in 1983. Finished Anadolu University. Started journalism at Gün TV in 2011. After Gün TV was shut down, she worked at Özgürlükçü Demokrasi Daily.
Gül TV and Özgürlükçü Gündem were shut down by Decree-Laws (KHK) within the scope of the State of Emergency (OHAL) declared in the aftermath of the attempted military coup on July 15th, 2016. During the State of Emergency, numerous press outlets were shut down by these Decree-Laws passed by the government, without the parliament’s approval.
She worked as the distributor of Azadiya Welat Daily, which is published in Kurdish. At the same time she prepared and presented the TV show “Kadın Bakışı”. Later she worked at Jin Women’s News Agency as a reporter. She is still working as an editor of a weekly women’s show and news broadcast at a private production company.
On March 1, 2018, while she was a reporter at Jin News, she was taken into custody in Lice Province of Diyarbakır on the grounds that “there was a search warrant against her”. After being detained for four days, she was released to pend trial with a ban on leaving the country.
The indictment accused her for the phone calls she made to invite guests to the show and her social media posts, while she was working as a distributor. She was accused of “knowingly and willingly aiding a terrorist organisation without taking part in its hierarchical structure” and making propaganda for a terrorist organisation”. She is requested to be sentenced to, from six years to 15 years of imprisonment.
She is released pending trial.
Journalist Durket Süren, on March 1, 2018, while she was a reporter at Jin News Women’s News Agency, was taken into custody at the gendarmerie check point at the entrance of Lice Province of Diyarbakır. It was claimed that “there was a search warrant against her”. After her medical checks at Lice State Hospital, she was sent to Lice Police Precinct. Following the paperwork process, she was taken to the Diyarbakır Police Station.
Her detainment process took four days. On March 5, 2018, she was sent to the court. She was accused of “membership of terrorist organisation” and “making propaganda for a terrorist organisation”.
According to the indictment, Süren, in the defence statement she gave during the investigation said, she was working at Jin News Women’s News Agency and that whether there was a Recall Order regarding the subject matter newspapers. She also stated that she was a member of the Independent Journalists’ Association, which was shut down by State of Emergency Decree-Law.
After the interrogation at the prosecutor’s office, she was sent to the court with a request for her release with judicial control condition.
Criminal Court of Peace imposed a ban on leaving the country against her and released her to pend trial.
The indictment against her was completed on February 12, 2019.
The indictment against journalist Durket Süren was completed by Diyarbakır Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, on February 12, 2019.
The indictment was 16-pages long. 11 pages of the indictment were reserved to “the foundation, purpose, pact, hierarchy, structural scheme and members of board of executives of Kurdistan Communities Union (KCK)”. Accusations regarding Süren started at the 11th page of the indictment.
According to the indictment, Süren’s phone was tapped by a court order. The indictment included the recordings of Süren’s four different phone calls. According to that, it was seen that two of these phone calls were about the Süren’s job as the distributor of Azadiya Welat and Özgürlükçü Demokrasi newspapers.
Other two phone call recordings that were included in the indictment appeared to be about inviting legal expert women to the TV show called “Kadın Bakışı” that Süren hosted with an association.
The indictment accused Süren of “taking part in the hierarchical structure of the PKK/KCK terrorist organisation and following instructions and orders of the organisation”.
On the other hand, the indictment lined 14 posts Süren shared on her personal twitter account between 2014 and 2016.
Süren was accused of; being a member of Independent Journalists’ Association, which was shut down by a decree-law and distributing Özgürlükçü Demokrasi and Azadiya Welat newspapers, which too were shut down.
The indictment accused Süren of “knowingly and willingly aiding an armed terrorist organisation without being in its hierarchical structure” according to the articles 220/7 and 314/2 of the Turkish Penal Code. She was requested to be sentenced to, from five years to 10 years of imprisonment.
Süren was also accused of “making propaganda for a terrorist organisation” according to the article 7/2 of the Anti-Terror Law. Within that scope, Süren was requested to be sentenced to, from one year to five years of imprisonment.
Therefor in total Süren was facing from six years to 15 years of imprisonment.
Süren was also requested to be “bereaved of specific rights” according to the article 53 of the Turkish Penal Code.
The indictment was accepted by Diyarbakır 11th Assize Court on February 18, 2019.
Trial of journalist Durket Süren started with the first hearing at Diyarbakır 11th Assize Court on May 8, 2019. Süren was present at the hearing alongside her attorneys Resul Temur, Pirozhan Karali, Abdullah Zeytun and Yusuf Erdoğan.
Süren, in her defence statement at the first hearing said; “I used to work at the women’s news agency. I used to make news about women’s rights. I do not accept these charges. I had an account but I did not share any posts to constitute the crime of propaganda. I just distributed the paper at the selected organisations.”
Court showed Süren the photos that were found in the subject matter social media posts. Süren said; “I have a twitter account but I do not remember if I shared these”.
Süren’s attorney Pirozhan Karali, stated that the social media posts were from the past. Karali said, “My client is already saying that she opened the account but did not share the posts. Therefore it requires a detection”. Karali stated that they did not accept the “subjects of helping and getting help from the organisation”. Karali requested Süren to be exempted from the hearings, meaning she would not have to appear at the hearings.
Attorney Resul Temur, too, stated that Süren could not be punished for distributing newspapers. He stated that both of the person Süren had the phone calls in the indictment were tried and acquitted.
Court lifted Süren’s obligation to take part in the hearings. It also ruled to wait for the report of Financial Crimes Investigation Board (MASAK) regarding the company founded to distribute the paper, which then was closed and the digital inspection report regarding the social media posts.
Second hearing of the case was held on October 2, 2019. Durket Süren took part in the hearing alongside her attorneys Yusuf Erdoğan and Pirozhan Karali. It was announced that previously requested reports had not yet arrived to the court. Court ruled to wait for the reports.
Third hearing of the case was held on February 5, 2020. Durket Süren was not present. Süren was represented by her attorneys. Court once again ruled to wait for the previously requested reports.
Fourth hearing of the case was set to continue on May 18, 2020. However the hearing was postponed due to the measures taken against the coronavirus pandemic.
Trial is set to continue with the fifth hearing on September 28, 2020.
Mahkeme heyetinin yerini almasıyla duruşma, saatinde başladı. Gazeteci Durket Süren’in katılmadığı duruşmada, avukatı hazır bulundu. MASAK raporuna ilişkin hazırlanan dijital inceleme sonuçlarının henüz mahkemeye gelmediği açıklandı.
Avukatlar ve duruşma savcısı, dosyadaki eksik hususların tamamlanmasını istedi.
Mahkeme heyeti, dijital materyallerin inceleme sonuçlarının beklenmesine karar verdi. Duruşma, 20 Eylül 2021 tarihine, saat 09:35’e ertelendi.
Mahkeme heyetinin yerini almasını ile birlikte duruşma, saatinde başladı. Dava kapsamında tutuksuz yargılanan gazeteci Durket Süren duruşmaya katılmadı. Süren’in avukatı Yusuf Erdoğan duruşmada hazır bulundu.
Kriminal Polis Raporunun geldiği ancak dijital materyallerin inceleme raporunun dosyaya gönderilmediği belirtildi.
Duruşmada söz alan avukat Yusuf Erdoğan ve duruşma savcısı, dijital materyallerin inceleme raporunun beklenilmesini istedi.
Mahkeme Heyeti ara vermeden kararını açıkladı. Mahkeme, dijital materyallerin inceleme raporlarının beklenmesine karar vererek, duruşmayı 26 Nisan 2021 tarihine, saat 09.45’e erteledi.
Duruşma Salonu Koşulları
Diyarbakır Adliyesinin standart salonlarından biriydi.
Duruşma salonuna pandemi nedeniyle izleyici alınmadı.
Adliyeye girişte pandemi nedeniyle yurttaşlar tek tek içeri alındı. Kapılarda HES kodu sorgulaması yapıldıktan sonra adliyeye girişlere izin verildi.
Duruşma saatinde başlayıp, beş dakika sürdü.
Saat 10.00’da başlaması gereken duruşma, 10 dakika erken başladı.
Yargılanan gazeteci Durket Süren, duruşmaya katılmadı. Süren’i, duruşmada; avukatları Yusuf Erdoğan ve Resul Temur temsil etti.
Duruşmada, bir önceki duruşmanın koronavirüs pandemisi karşısında alınan önlemler kapsamında ertelendiği belirtildi. Bu not, duruşma tutanağına da yazıldı.
Mahkeme, yargılamanın ilk duruşmasında; Süren hakkındaki suçlama ile ilgili olarak, Özgürlükçü Demokrasi ve Azadiya Welat gazetelerinin dağıtımı için kurulan ve daha sonra kapatılan şirketlere ilişkin Mali Suçları Araştırma Kurulu (MASAK) raporu talep edilmişti.
Mahkeme, bu duruşmada; beklenen MASAK raporunun geldiğini açıkladı.
Mahkeme, yine daha önce; Süren’in sosyal medya hesapları ile ilgili dijital inceleme raporu talep etmişti. Raporun, henüz ulaşmadığı belirtildi.
Süren’in avukatları Yusuf Erdoğan ve Resul Temur, dosyadaki eksiklerin tamamlanmasını talep etti. Duruşma savcısı da aynı talepte bulundu.
Mahkeme heyeti, kararını ara vermeden açıkladı.
Mahkeme, Süren’in; sosyal medya hesapları ile ilgili dijital inceleme raporunun beklenmesine karar verdi.
Yargılamanın, 25 Ocak 2021 tarihinde görülecek altıncı duruşma ile devam etmesine karar verildi.
Adliyeye gelenler, koronavirüs pandemisi karşısında alınan önlemler nedeniyle içeriye teker teker alındı.
Adliyeye, Sağlık Bakanlığı’nın pandemi ile mücadele kapsamında cep telefonları için geliştirdiği Hayat Eve Sığar uygulamasından kod üretilmesinin zorunlu olduğu belirtildi.
Duruşma, belirlenen saatten 10 dakika erken başladı.
Duruşmayı iki basın mensubu ve iki sivil polis takip etti.
Duruşmada olağanüstü bir gelişme yaşanmadı. Duruşma, yaklaşım iki dakika sürdü.
Durket Süren - “Establishing Organisations for the Purpose of Committing Crimes” and “Propaganda of Terrorist Organization” Trial (Minutes of the Hearing)
Durket Süren - “Establishing Organisations for the Purpose of Committing Crimes” and “Propaganda of Terrorist Organization” Trial (Indictment)
Durket Süren - “Establishing Organisations for the Purpose of Committing Crimes” and “Propaganda of Terrorist Organization” Trial 5. Standing (Minutes of the Hearing)
Durket Süren - “Establishing Organisations for the Purpose of Committing Crimes” and “Propaganda of Terrorist Organization” Trial 6. Standing (Minutes of the Hearing)
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.